From b67b7f2b784c7105e88a5e639d9d84736ae2cbc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michele Calgaro Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2023 12:38:43 +0900 Subject: uncrustify-trinity: updated based on upstream version 0.78.1 Signed-off-by: Michele Calgaro --- .../documentation/Conditional_operator.txt-save | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) create mode 100644 debian/uncrustify-trinity/uncrustify-trinity-0.78.1/documentation/Conditional_operator.txt-save (limited to 'debian/uncrustify-trinity/uncrustify-trinity-0.78.1/documentation/Conditional_operator.txt-save') diff --git a/debian/uncrustify-trinity/uncrustify-trinity-0.78.1/documentation/Conditional_operator.txt-save b/debian/uncrustify-trinity/uncrustify-trinity-0.78.1/documentation/Conditional_operator.txt-save new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a9448718 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/uncrustify-trinity/uncrustify-trinity-0.78.1/documentation/Conditional_operator.txt-save @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +The bug https://github.com/uncrustify/uncrustify/issues/1130 +shows the problem with the conditional operator ? +indent_ternary_operator not aligning correctly. + +The solution is to transform the simple call to a recursiv call. +The position of ? must be saved for each level and be used to +position the colon operator. -- cgit v1.2.1