diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'twin/HACKING')
-rw-r--r-- | twin/HACKING | 174 |
1 files changed, 174 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/twin/HACKING b/twin/HACKING new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3dcd579f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/twin/HACKING @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@ +Mailing list and bugzilla: +========================== + +The KWin mailing list is twin@kde.org . It's rather low traffic. + +The bugs.kde.org product for KWin is 'twin'. Currently the components are 'general' (KWin core), +'decorations' (decoration plugins), 'compatibility' (problems with non-KDE WMs/apps) and +'eyecandy' (transparency and similar effects). +There are also two kcontrol components 'kcmtwindecoration' and 'kcmtwinoptions' related +to KWin's KControl modules. + + +KWin parts: +=========== + +There are four parts of KWin: +- The KWin core, located in kdebase/twin/*, which implements the actual functionality. +- The decoration plugins, located in kdebase/twin/clients and kdeartwork/twin-styles, which + are responsible for the visual representation of the windows. +- The libkdecoration library, located in kdebase/twin/lib/*, which is used for communication + between the core and the decoration, and also implements some shared functionality + for the decorations. +- KControl modules, located in kdebase/twin/kcmtwin. + + +KWin decorations: +================= + +If you want to develop a decoration plugin for KWin, a HOWTO is available at +http://www.usermode.org/docs/twintheme.html . It is currently not possible to create +a new decoration without knowledge of C++, but it should be possible to write a themeable +decoration (I'm not aware of any such decoration though). + + +Restarting KWin: +================ + +Since KWin takes care of focus handling, first killing KWin and then launching new instance +can cause focus trouble. Therefore it's possible to run 'twin --replace', which will start +new KWin instance and tell the old one to quit. + + +Handling the case when KWin crashes: +==================================== + +Again, without KWin running there may be focus problems. The simplest way to solve them +is to add the 'Run Command' applet to Kicker - it can receive focus even without KWin running. +If you can't add the applet or can reach it for some reason, switch to text console, and run +'DISPLAY=:0 twin --replace' (and then you can run 'twin --replace' again from X). + +If KWin is temporarily unusable because of some change and e.g. crashes during startup, it +is possible to run another window manager, for example Metacity, OpenBox or FVWM (the command +is similar to restarting KWin, i.e. 'metacity --replace', 'openbox --replace' or 'fvwm -replace'). + + +Debugging KWin: +=============== + +Focus problems once more. It is not possible to debug KWin in gdb in the X session that KWin is managing, +because that'd block focus and window operations. It is necessary to switch to a text console +and attach to the running KWin instance from there, or launch it as 'DISPLAY=:0 gdb twin'. + +Since KWin is such an important component of KDE, it is usually better to start another X for development. +Note that XNest is quite buggy and is therefore not recommended to use. + + +Window manager spec: +==================== + +The EWMH window manager specification, also known as NETWM, is located at the freedesktop.org site, +http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Standards_2fwm_2dspec . It defines how the window manager +communicates information with the applications and other desktop utilities such as the taskbar +or pager. + + +KWin structure: +=============== + +KWin has relatively few classes. The two main classes are Client, which represents windows +on the screen, and Workspace, which represents the whole screen and manages windows. Both these +classes are rather large, because they fulfil complicated tasks. In other to reduce size +of their source files these some functionality is in separate .cpp file grouped by the purpose: + +- workspace.* - core of class Workspace +- client.* - core of class Client +- activation.cpp - focus handling and window activation +- events.cpp - event handling is in events.cpp +- geometry.cpp - geometry-related code +- layers.cpp - stacking-related code +- manage.cpp - code dealing with new windows +- placement.cpp - window placements algorithms +- rules.cpp - code for window-specific settings +- sm.cpp - session management code +- useractions.cpp - handling of the Alt+F3 menu, shortcuts and other user actions + +The rest of the files contain additional helper classes: + +- atoms.* - so-called atoms (symbolic names for constants in X) +- bridge.* - communication with the decoration plugin +- geometrytip.* - window displaying window geometry while moving/resizing +- group.* - grouping related windows together (warning! This is currently really messy and scary code + that should be rewritten). +- killwindow.* - handling of the Ctrl+Esc feature +- twinbindings.cpp - KWin's keyboard shortcuts (used by kdebase/kcontrol/keys) +- notifications.* - for KNotify +- options.* - all configuration options for KWin are stored in this class +- plugins.* - loading of the right decoration plugin +- popupinfo.* - showing temporary information such as virtual desktop name when switching desktops +- tabbox.* - the Alt+Tab dialog +- utils.* - various small utility functions/classes + +KWin also uses code from kdelibs, specifically files netwm.cpp, netwm.h, netwm_def.h and netwm_p.h +from kdelibs/tdecore. These files implement support for the EWMH window manager specification, +originally called NETWM (hence the filenames). + + +Developing KWin: +================ + +So, you feel brave, huh? But KWin is not THAT difficult. Some parts, especially the X-related ones, +can be very complicated, but for many parts even knowledge of X and Xlib is not necessary. Most X +code is wrapped in helper functions, and I can handle problems there ;) . However, although many +features don't require touching X/Xlib directly, still X/Xlib may impose their semantics on the way +things are done. When in doubt, simply ask. + +All patches for KWin core should be sent to twin@kde.org for review first. Even seemingly harmless +changes may have extensive consequences. + +Various notes: + +- kdDebug has overloaded operator << for the Client class, so you can e.g. use 'kdDebug() << this << endl;' +in class Client and it will print information about the window. + +- KWin itself cannot create any normal windows, because it would have trouble managing its own windows. +For such cases (which should be rare) a small external helper application is needed (kdialog should often +do, and for special cases such a utility needs to be written like twin/killer). + + +X documentation: +================ + +As already said, many parts of KWin don't need knowledge of Xlib or even how X actually works. +Some parts do, and it may be also useful to have at least a basic understand for general +understanding. A reference manual for Xlib can be found e.g. +at ftp://ftp.x.org/pub/X11R7.0/doc/PDF/xlib.pdf , a tutorial explaining basic can be found +e.g. at ttp://users.actcom.co.il/~choo/lupg/tutorials/xlib-programming/xlib-programming.html +(note that you don't need to know that all - e.g. GC's are very rarely needed and the +section on fonts is today outdated). + + +Coding style: +============= + +There are only three rules for patches for KWin: + +- the code should be relatively nice and clean. Seriously. Any messy code can be hard to comprehend, +but if the code is in a window manager it will be twice as difficult. + +- unless the functionality of the code is obvious, there should be either at least a short comment explaining +what it does, or it should be obvious from the commit log. If there's a hack needed, if there's a potentional +problem, if something is just a temporary fix, say so. Comments like "this clever trick is necessary" +don't count. See rule #1 above for reasons. I needed more than two years to understand all of KWin, +and there were parts I never got and had to rewrite in order to fix a problem with them. + +- put matching opening { and closing } in the same column. That's the only formatting rule I ask for. +I don't really care if they're aligned with the block one level higher or if they're aligned with the block +they surround like I do (which is the only thing about the "weird coding style in KWin") or if you align them +with something else, just put them in the same column. If I can handle about half a dozen different formatting +styles when working on various parts of KDE, this shouldn't be much work for you (and you can do that only +right before sending the patch). I don't care where you do and don't put spaces or what exactly you call local +variables, as long as I can read it (trying to make it look like the rest of the code is bonus points though ;) ). + + +twin@kde.org |