path: root/doc/faq/intro.docbook

<!--
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE chapter PUBLIC "-//KDE//DTD DocBook XML V4.2-Based Variant V1.1//EN"
 "dtd/kdex.dtd">
-->

<chapter id="introduction">
<title>Introduction</title>

<qandaset>
<qandaentry>
<question>
<para>What is &tde;?</para>
</question>
<answer>
<para>&tde; is the Trinity Desktop Environment. The project was initiated
by <ulink url="mailto:ettrich@kde.org">Matthias Ettrich</ulink> in
1996 and originally called the K Desktop Environment. The aim of the &tde; project is to connect the
power of the &UNIX; operating systems with the comfort of a modern user
interface.</para>
<para>If you want further information about &tde;, look at
<ulink url="http://www.trinitydesktop.org/about.php">About Trinity</ulink></para>
</answer>
</qandaentry>

<qandaentry>
<question id="platform">
<para>On which platforms can I expect &tde; to work?</para>
</question>
<answer>
<para>&tde; is a Desktop Environment for all flavors of &UNIX; systems.
While most &tde; developers use &Linux;, &tde; should run
on a wide range of systems. You might need to tweak the
source code a bit to get &tde; to compile on different variant
of &UNIX; systems, or when not using the &GNU; development tools, in
particular the &gcc; compiler.</para>
</answer>
</qandaentry>

<qandaentry>
<question>
<para>Why should I use TDE?</para>
</question>
<answer>
<para>TDE provides a traditional computer desktop that is snappy and
responsive. A project goal is to provide a highly customizable
desktop without forcing any particular feature or effect on users.
TDE comes with many software tools to provide a productive and enjoyable
computer desktop system.</para>
</answer>
</qandaentry>

<qandaentry>
<question>
<para>Is &tde; a window manager?</para>
</question>
<answer>
<para>No, &tde; is not a window manager. While &tde; includes a
sophisticated window manager (&twin;), &tde; is much more, providing
a full integrated desktop environment.</para>
<para>&tde; includes a web browser, a file manager, a window manager, a help system, a
configuration system, many tools and utilities, and many
applications, including but not limited to mail
and news clients, drawing programs, a PDF and a &DVI; viewer
and so forth.</para>
</answer>
</qandaentry>

<qandaentry>
<question>
<para>Is &tde; a <acronym>CDE</acronym>, &Windows; or &Mac;
<acronym>OS</acronym> clone?</para>
</question>
<answer>
<para>No, &tde; is not a clone. Specifically &tde; is not a
<acronym>CDE</acronym> or &Windows;  clone. While the &tde; developers
have and will continue to glean the best features from all existing
desktop environments, &tde; is a unique environment that has and
will continue to go its own way.</para>
</answer>
</qandaentry>

<qandaentry>
<question>
<para>On what platform is TDE based?</para>
</question>
<answer>
<para>TDE uses C++ and the <link linkend="qt">&Qt; C++ crossplatform toolkit</link>.
The TDE development team now maintains the Qt3 toolkit, renamed TQt3.</para>
</answer>
</qandaentry>

<qandaentry>
<question>
<para>Is &tde; free software?</para>
</question>
<answer>
<para>Yes, &tde; is free software according to the &GNU; General
Public License. All &tde; libraries are available under the
<acronym>LGPL</acronym> making commercial software development for the
&tde; desktop possible, but all &tde; applications are licensed under
the <acronym>GPL</acronym>.</para>
<para>&tde; uses the <link linkend="qt">&Qt; C++ crossplatform
toolkit</link>, which is also released (since version 2.2) under the
<acronym>GPL</acronym>.</para>
<para>Both &tde; and &Qt; can be made available on
&CD-ROM; free of charge. No runtime fees of any kind are
incurred.</para>
</answer>
</qandaentry>

<qandaentry>
<question>
<para>Why the rebranding and renaming efforts? Why can't you continue to call the software KDE?</para>
</question>
<answer>
<para>The "KDE" name, various logos, and related efforts are trademarked by the KDE
Foundation. Since the Trinity project is not affiliated with the KDE Foundation,
we can't legally use their trademarks.</para>
</answer>
</qandaentry>

<qandaentry>
<question>
<para>How is Trinity different from KDE4?</para>
</question>
<answer>
<para>Both desktop environments share common roots to KDE 3.5.10, the last
official release of KDE in the 3.x series. Many KDE developers wanted to break
from that code chain and tool sets to start afresh. Thus was born KDE4. In
addition to moving to the Qt4 tool set, the KDE developers revamped the
underlying KDE code set.</para>

<para>KDE4 and Trinity have different philosophies about work flow preferences.
KDE4 developers want to support emerging work flow concepts and techniques.
Trinity developers want to maintain a "traditional" desktop environment.</para>

<para>For example, KDE4 offers the following tools:</para>

<itemizedlist>

<listitem>
<para>Semantic desktop through Nepomuk</para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
<para>PIM (Personal Information Management) data caching through Akonadi</para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
<para>Desktop file searching through Strigi</para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
<para>Activities, a computer desktop metaphor for managing tasks and activities</para>
</listitem>

</itemizedlist>

<para>Whereas TDE offers the following:</para>

<itemizedlist>

<listitem>
<para>Desktop search through the locate:/ kio-slave and Beagle</para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
<para>Integrated PIM suite with plugins</para>
</listitem>

<listitem>
<para>Related task management using multiple desktops</para>
</listitem>

</itemizedlist>

<para>The KDE developers support alternate desktop interfaces, such as those used
with netbooks, tablets, and smart phones. TDE provides a single interface that is
optimized for the mouse/keyboard HCI (Human-computer interaction) model.</para>

<para>Both desktop environments provide an excellent choice for different work
flows but differ in approach. Trinity leans toward user expectations of how
desktop environments have functioned traditionally. There is a sense of
familiarity with that environment many people like. Similarly other users prefer
the work flow features offered by KDE4 because those features match their
expectations of how they want their computer to behave. The difference between the
two environments does not mean one is smaller, buggier, or slower -- only that
they are different and appeal to different types of people. Although sharing a
common heritage, both desktops appeal to different groups of people. As always
with free/libre software, there is a choice.</para>
</answer>
</qandaentry>


</qandaset>
</chapter>