From 9ba04742771370f59740e32e11c5f3a1e6a1b70a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Timothy Pearson Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:55:57 -0600 Subject: Initial TQt conversion --- kjsembed/docs/kjsembed-qsa.html | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'kjsembed/docs/kjsembed-qsa.html') diff --git a/kjsembed/docs/kjsembed-qsa.html b/kjsembed/docs/kjsembed-qsa.html index 2de920d8..9355c268 100644 --- a/kjsembed/docs/kjsembed-qsa.html +++ b/kjsembed/docs/kjsembed-qsa.html @@ -1,32 +1,32 @@ -KJSEmbed and QSA +KJSEmbed and TQSA -

KJSEmbed and QSA

KJSEmbed and TQSA

Introduction

-There are a lot of similarities between QSA and KJSEmbed, and this has +There are a lot of similarities between TQSA and KJSEmbed, and this has led to some confusion. This document aims to shed some light on the differences between the two libraries.

The Differences

QSA has a nice built in script editor which kjsembed does not, +
TQSA has a nice built in script editor which kjsembed does not, but kjsembed can load designers ui files anyway and it would be easy to add.
KJSEmbed has facilities for working with KActions and can even load them from XML files.
KJSEmbed makes it easier to operate with Qt types than QSA. Take +
KJSEmbed makes it easier to operate with Qt types than TQSA. Take a look at the types documentation for more details.
KJSEmbed has support for KDE specific types such as KURL. QSA +
KJSEmbed has support for KDE specific types such as KURL. TQSA does not support these types by default, but does provide facilities for adding support yourself.
KJSEmbed is LGPL while QAS is GPL.
KJSEmbed is LGPL while TQAS is GPL.

-- cgit v1.2.1